{"id":1804,"date":"2025-10-24T11:44:21","date_gmt":"2025-10-24T09:44:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/?p=1804"},"modified":"2025-10-24T11:44:21","modified_gmt":"2025-10-24T09:44:21","slug":"olg-brandenburg-auslegung-einer-belastungsvollmacht-fehlende-erwaehnung-von-%c2%a7-800-zpo-unschaedlich","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/aktuelles\/olg-brandenburg-auslegung-einer-belastungsvollmacht-fehlende-erwaehnung-von-%c2%a7-800-zpo-unschaedlich\/","title":{"rendered":"OLG Brandenburg: Interpretation of a debit authorization (lack of mention of \u00a7 800 ZPO harmless)"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3 data-start=\"379\" data-end=\"455\">OLG Brandenburg facilitates practice with debit powers (\u00a7 800 ZPO)<\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"457\" data-end=\"799\">The <strong data-start=\"461\" data-end=\"494\">Higher Regional Court of Brandenburg<\/strong> by resolution of <strong data-start=\"517\" data-end=\"556\">September 23, 2025 (Ref. 5 W 120\/24)<\/strong> a practical decision on the <strong data-start=\"595\" data-end=\"634\">Interpretation of debit authorizations<\/strong> taken. The court provides clarity for the <strong data-start=\"685\" data-end=\"732\">Creation of enforceable mortgages<\/strong> and thus creates more legal certainty in the <strong data-start=\"776\" data-end=\"798\">Land register proceedings<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h3 data-start=\"801\" data-end=\"866\">Starting point: Power of attorney to create mortgages<\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"868\" data-end=\"942\">In a <strong data-start=\"877\" data-end=\"892\">Purchase contract<\/strong> was the following <strong data-start=\"906\" data-end=\"929\">Power of attorney to debit<\/strong> included:<\/p>\n<blockquote data-start=\"943\" data-end=\"1203\">\n<p data-start=\"945\" data-end=\"1203\">\u201eThe seller authorizes the purchaser to create mortgages in any amount and with any ancillary services, including in enforceable form, to the detriment of the subject matter of the contract and to issue declarations of purpose and land register declarations.\u201c<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p data-start=\"1205\" data-end=\"1523\">The purchaser then ordered a <strong data-start=\"1243\" data-end=\"1258\">Land charge<\/strong>, which <strong data-start=\"1264\" data-end=\"1297\">enforceable pursuant to \u00a7 800 ZPO<\/strong> should be. The <strong data-start=\"1315\" data-end=\"1337\">Land Registry (GBA)<\/strong> considered the power of attorney to be <strong data-start=\"1369\" data-end=\"1390\">not sufficient<\/strong>. Reasoning: The scope of the power of attorney should be interpreted narrowly and \u201eenforceable\u201c does not necessarily mean \u201eenforceable in accordance with Section 800 ZPO\u201c.<\/p>\n<h3 data-start=\"1525\" data-end=\"1565\">The decision of the OLG Brandenburg<\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"1567\" data-end=\"2029\">The <strong data-start=\"1571\" data-end=\"1590\">OLG Brandenburg<\/strong> disagreed with this narrow interpretation. In his opinion, the wording \u201eenforceable against the subject matter of the contract\u201c also includes the <strong data-start=\"1731\" data-end=\"1767\">Enforceability according to \u00a7 800 ZPO<\/strong>. The court expressly distinguishes between the <strong data-start=\"1821\" data-end=\"1861\">Subjection to all assets<\/strong> and the <strong data-start=\"1870\" data-end=\"1905\">Subjection to land ownership<\/strong>. It also takes into account the <strong data-start=\"1935\" data-end=\"1974\">Interests of the contracting parties<\/strong> and the practical meaning of the formulation.<\/p>\n<h3 data-start=\"2031\" data-end=\"2059\">Significance for practice<\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"2061\" data-end=\"2576\">The result of the decision is <strong data-start=\"2094\" data-end=\"2130\">practical and welcome<\/strong>, although not entirely beyond doubt. Due to the complex <strong data-start=\"2193\" data-end=\"2219\">Dogmatics of \u00a7 800 ZPO<\/strong> there can theoretically be cases in which a <strong data-start=\"2267\" data-end=\"2343\">Submission only due to the claim in rem (Section 794 (1) No. 5 ZPO)<\/strong> without an express submission in accordance with \u00a7 800 ZPO.<br data-start=\"2405\" data-end=\"2408\" \/>In the <strong data-start=\"2415\" data-end=\"2437\">Contract design<\/strong> should therefore continue <strong data-start=\"2461\" data-end=\"2486\">clear and explicit<\/strong> it should be noted that <strong data-start=\"2513\" data-end=\"2563\">Mortgages enforceable in accordance with \u00a7 800 ZPO<\/strong> should be.<\/p>\n<h3 data-start=\"2578\" data-end=\"2615\">Note for notarial practice<\/h3>\n<p data-start=\"2617\" data-end=\"3103\">The land registry based its decision on an older <strong data-start=\"2677\" data-end=\"2701\">Case law<\/strong>, according to which a power of attorney for the sale of a property does not automatically <strong data-start=\"2786\" data-end=\"2837\">Encumbrance with enforceable mortgages<\/strong> justified. However, this view is <strong data-start=\"2878\" data-end=\"2902\">no longer up to date<\/strong>: It contradicts today's <strong data-start=\"2934\" data-end=\"2956\">notarial practice<\/strong> and the <strong data-start=\"2965\" data-end=\"2998\">current understanding of the term<\/strong>.<br data-start=\"2999\" data-end=\"3002\" \/>Nevertheless, it remains in practice <strong data-start=\"3036\" data-end=\"3051\">to note<\/strong>, as long as there is no uniform case law.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Higher Regional Court of Brandenburg facilitates practice in the case of encumbrance powers of attorney (Section 800 ZPO) In its decision dated September 23, 2025 (case no. 5 W 120\/24), the Higher Regional Court of Brandenburg issued a decision of practical relevance regarding the interpretation of encumbrance powers of attorney. The court provides clarity for the creation of enforceable mortgages and thus creates more legal certainty in land register proceedings. Starting point: Power of attorney to create security rights over real property In...<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1804"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1804\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1806,"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1804\/revisions\/1806"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notar-heinze.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}